Advances in Production Engineering & Management
Volume 20 | Number 1 | March 2025 | pp 61–74
https://doi.org/10.14743/apem2025.1.527
Independent vs. collaborative blockchain Research and Development: Operational decisions in food supply chains
Kang, Y.X.; Feng, J.Y.; Zhang, W.J.
ABSTRACT AND REFERENCES (PDF) |
FULL ARTICLE TEXT (PDF)
A B S T R A C T
As blockchain increasingly demonstrates advantages in enhancing consumer trust and reducing collaborative production costs in food supply chains, more food companies are developing blockchain-based supply chain management platforms. However, in a complex and competitive supply chain environment, food companies face critical operational management challenges in selecting appropriate blockchain R&D approaches and determining optimal R&D levels. This study examines two competing food companies deciding on their optimal food production and blockchain R&D levels. We first established a benchmark model without blockchain adoption. Then, we constructed supply chain operation models for both independent and collaborative blockchain R&D scenarios. By comparing equilibrium decisions across different models, we derived the optimal blockchain R&D model and operational strategies in food supply chains. Furthermore, we extended our analysis to consider asymmetric food substitution scenarios. Our findings revealed that independent blockchain R&D tends to increase equilibrium food production and is more suitable for premium food supply chains. Conversely, collaborative blockchain R&D significantly enhanced overall supply chain profitability. As spillover effects increase, food companies are likely to favor independent blockchain R&D to achieve higher R&D levels and stronger market competitiveness. Additionally, we demonstrated that blockchain R&D levels are influenced by food substitutability and quality credibility.
A R T I C L E I N F O
Keywords • Blockchain adoption; Food supply chains; Game theory; Competitive collaboration; Operation strategy; Spillover effects
Corresponding author • Feng, J.Y.
Article history • Received 1 October 2024, Revised 31 March 2025, Accepted 7 April 2025
Published on-line • 29 April 2025
E X P O R T C I T A T I O N
» RIS format (EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software)
» BibTeX (JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software)
» Plain text
